ChatterBack🔍Join
States/Idaho/MeshCore/ID Chilco Rptr 📻
MC

ID Chilco Rptr 📻Repeater

29821c2bf12e · Idaho
● Heard 6 h agovia analyzer.cascadiamesh.org
Position as last reported by the node. Members’ own nodes can be shown at grid precision instead.

How this repeater scores

CoreScope · relative to this mesh
F
0.11 / 1.00
below 0.15. 0.15 would make it D.
636
relayed · 24 h
  • Bridgeweight 0.300.01 × 0.30 = 0.002

    How much of the mesh has to pass through it. A chokepoint between two halves of a network scores high. Traffic has other ways round. Not a fault - it means the area is well connected.

  • Coverageweight 0.250.30 × 0.25 = 0.076

    How much of the mesh it can reach, weighted so near neighbours count more than distant ones.

  • Redundancyweight 0.250.13 × 0.25 = 0.031

    What breaks if it vanishes. High means nothing else covers its job. Something else already covers what it does, so losing it would not split the mesh.

  • Trafficweight 0.200.01 × 0.20 = 0.001

    How much it actually relayed, measured rather than inferred from the map. It is carrying little traffic compared with the busiest repeater here.

What would actually change this

A low grade on a repeater that works fine usually means the area is well served, not that the machine is bad. Over half the weight — Bridge and Redundancy — describes where it sits among its neighbours, and neither is yours to move.

  • This one is well sited

    It out-reaches 27 of the 47 repeaters within 25 miles, which average 0.20. If the grade is still low, that is about position in the network rather than anything the radio is doing wrong.

  • A low Bridge is not a fault

    Bridge measures how much traffic has no choice but to pass through this node. It falls when neighbours put up repeaters that cover the same ground — so it can drop without anything changing here at all. There is nothing to tune.

Every axis is scored against the other repeaters this analyzer can see, so 1.00 means “the best of these” rather than perfect, and a grade here is not comparable with one from another mesh. CoreScope’s own note on the bands is that they are a first cut, not tuned against real data — so treat the letter as a rough impression and the number as the real answer.

History

47 samples · last 30 days

History starts from today. Readings were only ever stored as a single latest value before now, so there is nothing earlier to show — trends will fill in as the mesh is sampled.

Node

from the mesh, refreshed every few hours
Protocol
MeshCore
Node ID
29821c2bf12e
Role
Repeater
Hardware
-
Preset
-
Channel
-
Firmware
-
Neighbors
-
Relayed 24 h
636
Adverts seen
31
Coverage
0.30
Usefulness
F · 0.11
First seen
2026-09-29