Renoš«CoreRepeater
How this repeater scores
CoreScope Ā· relative to this mesh- Bridgeweight 0.300.23 Ć 0.30 = 0.070
How much of the mesh has to pass through it. A chokepoint between two halves of a network scores high.
- Coverageweight 0.250.36 Ć 0.25 = 0.091
How much of the mesh it can reach, weighted so near neighbours count more than distant ones.
- Redundancyweight 0.250.00 Ć 0.25 = 0.000
What breaks if it vanishes. High means nothing else covers its job. Something else already covers what it does, so losing it would not split the mesh.
- Trafficweight 0.200.25 Ć 0.20 = 0.050
How much it actually relayed, measured rather than inferred from the map.
What would actually change this
A low grade on a repeater that works fine usually means the area is well served, not that the machine is bad. Over half the weight ā Bridge and Redundancy ā describes where it sits among its neighbours, and neither is yours to move.
- About typical for the area
Coverage of 0.36 against an average of 0.30 across 49 repeaters within 25 miles.
- Redundancy at zero is good news
It means something else already covers this nodeās job, so losing it would not split the mesh. Raising this number would mean making the network more fragile. It is the one figure here nobody should chase.
Every axis is scored against the other repeaters this analyzer can see, so 1.00 means āthe best of theseā rather than perfect, and a grade here is not comparable with one from another mesh. CoreScopeās own note on the bands is that they are a first cut, not tuned against real data ā so treat the letter as a rough impression and the number as the real answer.