ChatterBack🔍Join
States/California/MeshCore/Ed Levin
MC

Ed LevinRepeater

1313062cc2b6 · California
● Heard 8 min agovia corescope.bayareameshcore.org
Position as last reported by the node. Members’ own nodes can be shown at grid precision instead.

How this repeater scores

CoreScope · relative to this mesh
D
0.25 / 1.00
D is 0.15 and above. 0.30 would make it C.
2759
relayed · 24 h
  • Bridgeweight 0.300.04 × 0.30 = 0.011

    How much of the mesh has to pass through it. A chokepoint between two halves of a network scores high. Traffic has other ways round. Not a fault - it means the area is well connected.

  • Coverageweight 0.250.72 × 0.25 = 0.179

    How much of the mesh it can reach, weighted so near neighbours count more than distant ones.

  • Redundancyweight 0.250.00 × 0.25 = 0.000

    What breaks if it vanishes. High means nothing else covers its job. Something else already covers what it does, so losing it would not split the mesh.

  • Trafficweight 0.200.30 × 0.20 = 0.060

    How much it actually relayed, measured rather than inferred from the map.

What would actually change this

A low grade on a repeater that works fine usually means the area is well served, not that the machine is bad. Over half the weight — Bridge and Redundancy — describes where it sits among its neighbours, and neither is yours to move.

  • This one is well sited

    It out-reaches 166 of the 185 repeaters within 25 miles, which average 0.47. If the grade is still low, that is about position in the network rather than anything the radio is doing wrong.

  • A low Bridge is not a fault

    Bridge measures how much traffic has no choice but to pass through this node. It falls when neighbours put up repeaters that cover the same ground — so it can drop without anything changing here at all. There is nothing to tune.

  • Redundancy at zero is good news

    It means something else already covers this node’s job, so losing it would not split the mesh. Raising this number would mean making the network more fragile. It is the one figure here nobody should chase.

Every axis is scored against the other repeaters this analyzer can see, so 1.00 means “the best of these” rather than perfect, and a grade here is not comparable with one from another mesh. CoreScope’s own note on the bands is that they are a first cut, not tuned against real data — so treat the letter as a rough impression and the number as the real answer.

History

48 samples · last 30 days
Neighbours2821–28

Node

from the mesh, refreshed every few hours
Protocol
MeshCore
Node ID
1313062cc2b6
Role
Repeater
Hardware
-
Preset
-
Channel
-
Firmware
-
Neighbors
28
Relayed 24 h
2759
Adverts seen
101
Coverage
0.72
Usefulness
D · 0.25
First seen
2026-09-09