TEH - Mountain ValleyRepeater
How this repeater scores
CoreScope · relative to this mesh- Bridgeweight 0.300.25 × 0.30 = 0.074
How much of the mesh has to pass through it. A chokepoint between two halves of a network scores high.
- Coverageweight 0.250.03 × 0.25 = 0.007
How much of the mesh it can reach, weighted so near neighbours count more than distant ones. It reaches a small part of the mesh. Height and antenna are what move this one.
- Redundancyweight 0.250.92 × 0.25 = 0.229
What breaks if it vanishes. High means nothing else covers its job.
- Trafficweight 0.200.00 × 0.20 = 0.000
How much it actually relayed, measured rather than inferred from the map. It is carrying little traffic compared with the busiest repeater here.
What would actually change this
- Siting is the gap, and height comes first
9 repeaters within 25 miles average 0.05 coverage and hear 7 neighbours; this one is at 0.03. That gap is where it sits, not the mesh being unfair. Height first, then feedline and antenna. Power last and least — on LoRa a badly sited node transmitting harder mostly adds interference.
Every axis is scored against the other repeaters this analyzer can see, so 1.00 means “the best of these” rather than perfect, and a grade here is not comparable with one from another mesh. CoreScope’s own note on the bands is that they are a first cut, not tuned against real data — so treat the letter as a rough impression and the number as the real answer.
History
48 samples · last 30 daysHistory starts from today. Readings were only ever stored as a single latest value before now, so there is nothing earlier to show — trends will fill in as the mesh is sampled.